| ||
| ||
|
The Quintessential Survival Guide in the Corporate Quagmire! | |
| |
|
5 Steps to Continuous Process Improvement
Part One of Creating Well-Defined Processes Series What if your sales increased from $100,000 to $110,000 per day and your profit increased from $10,000 to $11,000 - did you improve by 10%? The answer might shock you... Because the answer is no. No improvement occurred. In fact, your process deteriorated. Sure, revenue increased, but is this really an improvement? Let's take a look at the problem by looking at revenue and expenses. Extra Expenses Prevent Process Improvement Let's examine the before and the after scenario. Say, in the before picture, you have sales of $100,000, fixed costs of $20,000 and variable costs of $70,000. Total expenses amount to $90,000, giving you a gross profit of $10,000. In the after picture, sales increase to $110,000, while variable costs rise to $77,000 in addition to $2,000 in Extra Expenses - which give you total expenses of $99,000 and a gross profit of $11,000. In the after picture, remember though, fixed costs are fixed, and do not change with additional revenue. So you should get more than 10% (11.8% to be exact) profit from 10% growth. But in order to maintain a 10% profit we have to spend $2,000 in Extra Expenses. These Extra Expenses represent your process inefficiencies. These expenses could be sales discounts, travel, overtime, or something else. The names don't really matter. What does matter is that we are not improving. Process Evolution Enables Improvement Improvement results from process evolution, not from an increase in scale. What's the difference? Scale increases when we hire another person, increase expenses, or purchase more assets in order to acquire or service more business. Process evolution occurs when we change the process and as a result can release hidden capacity and service more business without adding any costs - and this is a form of efficiency. You can measure efficiency with the formula: Efficiency = Output / Costs But process evolution is about more than just changing costs. It is about changing time, increasing process velocity, and getting more output from the costs you already have. Cutting costs, by itself, does not evolve a process. In fact, reducing costs, without properly understanding how those costs relate to the process, can actually decrease process evolution (devolution). Let's review an example? A Cost Reduction and Procedures Training Case Study A company decreases costs by switching suppliers and using cheaper materials for their manufacturing process. Now the purchasing department is happy they are saving money. The bottom line is starting to look better as profits initially increase. And so this improved the process, right? Well... But then complaints start rolling in from the field. Products are breaking down faster. Technical support costs rise, and customers start reducing their orders. Not only do profits evaporate, but customer goodwill does too. To offset this, your first reaction might be to switch back to the old supplier. This is much easier and it fixes the immediate problem, but it won't recapture the lost sales, customers and damage to the company's reputation. But, again, you need to focus on the most important issue. There is a limit to the amount of costs one can reduce in any process - zero. You can't reduce costs below zero. On the other hand, there is no limit to the process potential we can achieve. Process evolution concerns the numerator (the output), not the denominator (the costs) in the efficiency equation above. Change in Process Evolution = New Output / Old Output (Assuming costs are held constant) By focusing on process evolution instead of costs we can continue to increase our output forever. We just have to make sure that the output increases faster than the costs. Then what we have is incremental improvement. But what procedures can you use to achieve this? Process Training It's all about collecting feedback to set the right priorities for your change process. You need feedback to drive the change process. The more feedback you get the better you will be able to evolve your process. So let's take a look at what your change process needs to include. 1. Feedback Records with Deficiency Notations 2. Trend Analysis 3. Corrective Action Process and Criteria for action 4. Audit Process 5. Management Review Process And then ask yourself the following questions about your change process: ? Are process feedback records created? ? Have the feedback records been analyzed for process deficiencies? ? Are the deficiencies analyzed for statistical significance? ? Are the deficiencies of statistical significance written up for corrective action? ? Is corrective/preventive action implemented? ? Is there an objective review of all processes to ensure the change process is working? ? Does management review all findings to ensure the change process is working -- and that processes are evolving to meet or exceed organizational requirements? Next week: Business Modeling With these thoughts in mind, you can see how important it is to first define continuous improvement and note how it can actually affect your business. But you can't gather feedback from all processes at once. If you did, that would generate a process overload. So where do you start? Next time we will show you show how when we discuss business modeling. Business modeling prioritizes which core processes you should improve. It tells you which processes are most important to not only achieve your company goals - but also to survive as a profitable business. Chris Anderson is the managing director of Bizmanualz, Inc. and co-author of policies and procedures manuals, producing the layout, process design and implementation to increase performance. To learn how to increase your business performance, visit: Bizmanualz, Inc.
MORE RESOURCES: Oracle to pay $1.9B for Taleo, extends SAP rivalry - FederalNewsRadio.com
PetroFrontier announces change in management - Sacramento Bee
Oracle to pay $1.9B for Taleo, extends SAP rivalry - WTOP
TEXT-S&P revises Apollo Investment Corp outlook to stable - Reuters
AMR bankruptcy: Retirees group files for involvement in case - Tulsa World
Integrated Asset Management Corp. Announces Results for the First Quarter of ... - MarketWatch (press release)
Eaton Vance Closed-end Diversified Equity Income Funds Declare Quarterly ... - Sacramento Bee
State: Revised map led to levee updates - Peoria Journal Star
Contract talks continue at Marathon, Tesoro refineries - Reuters
Cotter documents under review - Canon City Daily Record
|
|
|
|
RELATED ARTICLES
|
| home | site map | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy |
| © 2006 |
